See you on the other, more Biblical, side!
Saturday, January 30, 2010
Where have I gone?
I haven't posted much here lately - I've been spending all my blogging time on my new effort: musings and rantings on the weekly parashah. You can find it here.
Monday, August 31, 2009
Brief musings on religious faith upon meeting a devout Chabadnik at 770 Eastern Parkway
There's a man in 770 who spends two and a half hours every Shabbath afternoon, standing in front of the Rebbe's old chair, clapping and chanting Yechi. When I talk to him, his countenance is one of pure friendliness and joy. Yet when I look in his eyes, I see a thousand scimitars of the Prophet, the ingenious instrumentation of Torquemada, and the nuclear warheads on both sides of Wagah.
The differences between my messianic friend's benign form of worship and the more malignant version formerly practiced by Mohamed Atta and his ilk in this very city seem trivial; a matter of arbitrary coincidence. Understanding this, as we stand around 770 and make small talk, a strange feeling rises within me. Not fear - just an equanimous acceptance of zealotry's persistent existence, and an almost benevolent reverence of its timeless power.
The differences between my messianic friend's benign form of worship and the more malignant version formerly practiced by Mohamed Atta and his ilk in this very city seem trivial; a matter of arbitrary coincidence. Understanding this, as we stand around 770 and make small talk, a strange feeling rises within me. Not fear - just an equanimous acceptance of zealotry's persistent existence, and an almost benevolent reverence of its timeless power.
Wednesday, March 18, 2009
When somebody asks me a question, I tell them the answer.
Rorschach's Journal.
19th March, 2009.
Got a call from a telemarketer. Called himself Kenny. Spoke with an Indian accent. Pronounced "Bondi" as "Bon-DEE". Wanted to ask me three quick questions. I said I wanted to ask him three quick questions. One for one. He agreed.
My first question is: have you ever invested in the stock market?
Yes, I have. OK, my turn: have you seen Slumdog Millionaire?
No, I have not.
OK, your go.
Would you consider investing if a major opportunity with a potential for large profits arose and you felt like it?
Yes, I would. My turn: do you speak Hindustani?
No, I do not. Is it OK if one of our consultants sends you a letter regarding a major opportunity in the future?
Hmmm. . . my wife doesn't really like it when we get lots of calls and mail from investment places.
We are not like that, sir. We are professionals. You would only receive two to three letters a year.
Well, I guess that's OK then. Now, my last question: how much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?
. . . I don't know sir.
Guess.
I couldn't even guess.
Oh, come on, Kenny. You can do it! Just take a guess!
I'm not sure.
Listen to me, Kenny. When opportunity shows up, you don't sit back and worry. You get in there and you give it your best shot. Like when someone offers you a job that's hard, but it might be a way to a better life; you don't sit back and say, "it's too hard". You get in there and you give it your best shot. Am I right, Kenny??
Yes, you are right.
So give me a guess!
Is it three?
Close.
Is it five?
It's between three and five.
It is four then.
Yeah, you got it Kenny. You the man!
Thanks very much, sir.
Have an awesome day, Kenny.
You have a good day, too.
Ciao!
Ok, bye.
19th March, 2009.
Got a call from a telemarketer. Called himself Kenny. Spoke with an Indian accent. Pronounced "Bondi" as "Bon-DEE". Wanted to ask me three quick questions. I said I wanted to ask him three quick questions. One for one. He agreed.
My first question is: have you ever invested in the stock market?
Yes, I have. OK, my turn: have you seen Slumdog Millionaire?
No, I have not.
OK, your go.
Would you consider investing if a major opportunity with a potential for large profits arose and you felt like it?
Yes, I would. My turn: do you speak Hindustani?
No, I do not. Is it OK if one of our consultants sends you a letter regarding a major opportunity in the future?
Hmmm. . . my wife doesn't really like it when we get lots of calls and mail from investment places.
We are not like that, sir. We are professionals. You would only receive two to three letters a year.
Well, I guess that's OK then. Now, my last question: how much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?
. . . I don't know sir.
Guess.
I couldn't even guess.
Oh, come on, Kenny. You can do it! Just take a guess!
I'm not sure.
Listen to me, Kenny. When opportunity shows up, you don't sit back and worry. You get in there and you give it your best shot. Like when someone offers you a job that's hard, but it might be a way to a better life; you don't sit back and say, "it's too hard". You get in there and you give it your best shot. Am I right, Kenny??
Yes, you are right.
So give me a guess!
Is it three?
Close.
Is it five?
It's between three and five.
It is four then.
Yeah, you got it Kenny. You the man!
Thanks very much, sir.
Have an awesome day, Kenny.
You have a good day, too.
Ciao!
Ok, bye.
Saturday, January 31, 2009
Never Really Awake
I have been awake now for 30 hours straight. Wow... what a crazy time it's been. Photos and vids will show up eventually, but the salient points are:
Dawn Chorus, slow dancing, free books, a vocal bipolar Maori and Shmuley Boteach.
I'm sure there's more that I'll remember once I wake up tomorrow, but for now... I'm out!
Dawn Chorus, slow dancing, free books, a vocal bipolar Maori and Shmuley Boteach.
I'm sure there's more that I'll remember once I wake up tomorrow, but for now... I'm out!
Thursday, January 22, 2009
Congratulations, Mr. President
The other day I watched my first ever presidential inauguration. The last time America got a new president I was 12, and much too young to be bothering with this sort of pomp and circumstance.
I was looking forward to watching the oath of office; I was expecting it to be dramatic and poignant. Thanks a lot for ruining the memory, Chief Justice John Roberts. Obama noticed Roberts had said the words in the wrong order, waited for Roberts to correct himself, and then recited the words incorrectly anyway. Silly, silly Mr. President.
The inaugural address was decent enough. Among the generic "we will work together to defeat America's enemies and overcome its problems" spiel were some oratory nuggets. Of America's enemies Obama said, "we will extend them a hand if they are willing to unclench their fist." I'll be very interested to see how that plays out in his foreign policy.
"We shall harness the power of the sun, wind and soil," he said, of his alternate energy schemes. One anonymous wit postulated that Obama was actually Captain Planet.
But by far the greatest thing in that speech was Obama's statement, "we will restore science to its rightful place."
It filled me with happy feelings, and memories of Portal. Inspired, I threw this together on MS Paint:
Barack Obama: he does what he must because he can.
I was looking forward to watching the oath of office; I was expecting it to be dramatic and poignant. Thanks a lot for ruining the memory, Chief Justice John Roberts. Obama noticed Roberts had said the words in the wrong order, waited for Roberts to correct himself, and then recited the words incorrectly anyway. Silly, silly Mr. President.
The inaugural address was decent enough. Among the generic "we will work together to defeat America's enemies and overcome its problems" spiel were some oratory nuggets. Of America's enemies Obama said, "we will extend them a hand if they are willing to unclench their fist." I'll be very interested to see how that plays out in his foreign policy.
"We shall harness the power of the sun, wind and soil," he said, of his alternate energy schemes. One anonymous wit postulated that Obama was actually Captain Planet.
But by far the greatest thing in that speech was Obama's statement, "we will restore science to its rightful place."
It filled me with happy feelings, and memories of Portal. Inspired, I threw this together on MS Paint:
Barack Obama: he does what he must because he can.
Tuesday, January 6, 2009
If 1,000 people read this, AaronJ and Simmons are epic trendsetters
We've all signed into our Facebooks to be greeted by an avalanche of ridiculous invites. Your friends want you to register your approval of the latest chart-topping musician, absurd fashion trend, popular brand of coffee, or political development in the Middle East. They want you to join their fantasy army, mafioso organisation, vampire clan and feudal system.
Which is fine. People can waste their own (and others') time however they like. The bit that simultaneously amuses and irks me (just a little), is how seriously they seem to take it all. They really care how their fictional Bible study group and high school cheerleading squad are coming along.
The best bit is the "number" ones: "If 1,000 people join this group, I'll eat a cockroach"; "If 5,000 people join this group, I'll change my surname to 'Dudemeister'"; "If 100,000 people join this group, Israel's incursion into Gaza is morally, politically and militarily justified". For those of you who are slow to think but quick to keyboard, my point here has nothing to do with the "rightness" of Israel's martial shenanigans. I am simply pointing out the absurdity of believing that having a lot of people in a Facebook group has an actual effect on the Middle Eastern political situation.
Which is where my Facebook group comes in. I call it "1,000,000 strong against nothing in particular!" and the description reads "I bet I can find 1,000,000 people who want to be in a Facebook group with 1,000,000 people."
I'm probably misquoting Albert Camus when I say that "humans spend their whole lives attempting to prove to themselves that their lives are not absurd". But I'm pretty darn sure I've got Fiyero's line nailed...
"I say: why invite stress in? Stop studying strife. And learn to live the unexamined life..."
Which is fine. People can waste their own (and others') time however they like. The bit that simultaneously amuses and irks me (just a little), is how seriously they seem to take it all. They really care how their fictional Bible study group and high school cheerleading squad are coming along.
The best bit is the "number" ones: "If 1,000 people join this group, I'll eat a cockroach"; "If 5,000 people join this group, I'll change my surname to 'Dudemeister'"; "If 100,000 people join this group, Israel's incursion into Gaza is morally, politically and militarily justified". For those of you who are slow to think but quick to keyboard, my point here has nothing to do with the "rightness" of Israel's martial shenanigans. I am simply pointing out the absurdity of believing that having a lot of people in a Facebook group has an actual effect on the Middle Eastern political situation.
Which is where my Facebook group comes in. I call it "1,000,000 strong against nothing in particular!" and the description reads "I bet I can find 1,000,000 people who want to be in a Facebook group with 1,000,000 people."
I'm probably misquoting Albert Camus when I say that "humans spend their whole lives attempting to prove to themselves that their lives are not absurd". But I'm pretty darn sure I've got Fiyero's line nailed...
"I say: why invite stress in? Stop studying strife. And learn to live the unexamined life..."
Tuesday, December 16, 2008
Some Mild Heresy (with light showers in the afternoon)
I have just had an epiphany of sorts. You ready? Judaism is a gnostic faith. Allow me to explain.
Gnosticism is essentially the belief that the universe was created by an imperfect deity, known as the Demiurge, and that a Supreme Being of pure good exists indepently of said Demiurge. The Demiurge is usually thought of to be either malevolent or simply unable to properly execute perfect good. It's easy enough to see the God of the Hebrews as a Demiurge. After all, his track record is far from perfect. In the delightfully amusing language of Richard Dawkins:
"The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully."
But this raises the question: if He's the Demiurge, who's the Supreme Being? Who's the Force of pure, omnipotent good that will save us from this world of suffering?
The answer struck me this suddenly afternoon, as I sat in bemused debate with a small troupe of Lubavitchers who were attempting to persuade me to don tefillin. It was so blindingly obvious, that I am astonished I didn't figure it out sooner. The Supreme Being is this guy:
Ha. Bet you didn't think you'd see a photo of him on my blog. Or should that be a capitalised "Him"? After all, according to Lubavitch thought, that man is the Messiah. The one who will lead us into an era of pure good, and perfect/supplant the evil-ridden universe of the Hebrew God.
Sounds like gnosticism to me. What do you think?
Gnosticism is essentially the belief that the universe was created by an imperfect deity, known as the Demiurge, and that a Supreme Being of pure good exists indepently of said Demiurge. The Demiurge is usually thought of to be either malevolent or simply unable to properly execute perfect good. It's easy enough to see the God of the Hebrews as a Demiurge. After all, his track record is far from perfect. In the delightfully amusing language of Richard Dawkins:
"The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully."
But this raises the question: if He's the Demiurge, who's the Supreme Being? Who's the Force of pure, omnipotent good that will save us from this world of suffering?
The answer struck me this suddenly afternoon, as I sat in bemused debate with a small troupe of Lubavitchers who were attempting to persuade me to don tefillin. It was so blindingly obvious, that I am astonished I didn't figure it out sooner. The Supreme Being is this guy:
Ha. Bet you didn't think you'd see a photo of him on my blog. Or should that be a capitalised "Him"? After all, according to Lubavitch thought, that man is the Messiah. The one who will lead us into an era of pure good, and perfect/supplant the evil-ridden universe of the Hebrew God.
Sounds like gnosticism to me. What do you think?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)